From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bontemps v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 10, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-00005-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-00005-MCE-GGH P.

January 10, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 23, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that petitioner's copy of the findings and recommendations were returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 23, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rules 83-182(f), 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Bontemps v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 10, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-00005-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Bontemps v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, Petitioner, v. M.C. KRAMER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 10, 2008

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-00005-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2008)