From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bontempo v. Wolpoff Abramson, L.L.P.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 3, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-745 (W.D. Pa. May. 3, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-745.

May 3, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2007, after the plaintiffs filed a purported class action complaint in the above-captioned case, and after the defendant submitted a motion for summary judgment, and after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and after independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Document No. 25) is granted as to ¶ 32(b) of the complaint, on the plaintiffs' claim that its notice of arbitration was false, deceptive or misleading, and on the plaintiffs' claim that its request for all arbitration fees incurred was misleading and not authorized by the parties' agreement, and denied in all other respects.


Summaries of

Bontempo v. Wolpoff Abramson, L.L.P.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 3, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-745 (W.D. Pa. May. 3, 2007)
Case details for

Bontempo v. Wolpoff Abramson, L.L.P.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS J. BONTEMPO and TERRY MONTELEONE, and all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 3, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-745 (W.D. Pa. May. 3, 2007)