Bonney v. SSM Health Care St. Louis

Full title: Samuel D. BONNEY, Appellant, v. SSM HEALTH CARE ST. LOUIS, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Mar 10, 2020

598 S.W.3d 625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108202

03-10-2020

Samuel D. BONNEY, Appellant, v. SSM HEALTH CARE ST. LOUIS, Respondent.

David M. Heimos, 230 S. Bemiston, Suite 1200, St. Louis, MO. 63105, for appellant. Gregg M. Lemley, 7700 Bonhomme Ave, Suite 650, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, Amy L. Blaisdell, Co-Counsel, 10 S. Broadway, Suite 2000, St. Louis, MO. 63102, Heather M. Mehta, Co-Counsel, 5835 Pershing Ave, St. Louis, MO. 63112, Thomas R. Chibnall, Co-Counsel, 7700 Bonhomme Ave, Suite 650, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, James M. Paul, Co-Counsel, 7700 Bonhomme Ave, Suite 650, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

David M. Heimos, 230 S. Bemiston, Suite 1200, St. Louis, MO. 63105, for appellant.

Gregg M. Lemley, 7700 Bonhomme Ave, Suite 650, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, Amy L. Blaisdell, Co-Counsel, 10 S. Broadway, Suite 2000, St. Louis, MO. 63102, Heather M. Mehta, Co-Counsel, 5835 Pershing Ave, St. Louis, MO. 63112, Thomas R. Chibnall, Co-Counsel, 7700 Bonhomme Ave, Suite 650, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, James M. Paul, Co-Counsel, 7700 Bonhomme Ave, Suite 650, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J.; Sherri B. Sullivan, J.; and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

In this age-discrimination case brought under the Missouri Human Rights Act, Samuel D. Bonney appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant SSM Health Care St. Louis. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).