From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 11, 1998
709 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 97-05008

Opinion filed March 11, 1998.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Lynn Tepper, Judge.


James Norman Bonner challenges the trial court's summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm on all issues assailing the effectiveness of trial counsel without discussion. Bonner also alleged in his motion that his sentence is illegal under the dictates of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993). The trial court found that the claim was untimely and denied it. Bonner has received relief on this claim in a proceeding alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel in this court's case number 98-00272. Accordingly, we affirm that portion of his summary appeal as well because it is now moot.

Affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., ,and CAMPBELL and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bonner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 11, 1998
709 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Bonner v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES NORMAN BONNER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 11, 1998

Citations

709 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Bonner v. Crosby

On March 11, 1998, the state district court of appeal per curiam affirmed, in a written decision, in case no.…