From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonneau v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 4, 2013
503 F. App'x 544 (9th Cir. 2013)

Summary

affirming dismissal of inmate's petition; petitioner "fully served the custodial portion of the sentences he is attacking at the time he filed his habeas petition Therefore, the district court could not grant him any effective relief."

Summary of this case from McCrae v. Lackner

Opinion

No. 11-35807 D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00653-PK

01-04-2013

RYAN BONNEAU, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Ryan Bonneau appeals pro se from the district court's judgment on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We vacate and remand with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Bonneau's petition challenges the Bureau of Prisons' ("BOP") calculation of good time credits for sentences he has already served. In particular, he argues the BOP should have aggregated two of his earlier sentences and awarded him an additional 52 days of good time credit. Bonneau also argues that he is entitled to 53 days of good time credit because, while he was serving an earlier sentence, the BOP transferred him out of a Residential Drug Treatment Program in violation of his due process rights.

The record reflects that Bonneau had fully served the custodial portion of the sentences he is attacking at the time he filed his habeas petition, and that his current incarceration arises from a new conviction and violations of supervised release. Therefore, the district court could not grant him any effective relief and it should have dismissed his petition for lack of a case or controversy. See Burnett v. Lampert, 432 F.3d 996, 999-1000 (9th Cir. 2005); Nonnette v. Small, 316 F.3d 872, 875-76 (9th Cir. 2002). We vacate the district court's judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Bonneau v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 4, 2013
503 F. App'x 544 (9th Cir. 2013)

affirming dismissal of inmate's petition; petitioner "fully served the custodial portion of the sentences he is attacking at the time he filed his habeas petition Therefore, the district court could not grant him any effective relief."

Summary of this case from McCrae v. Lackner

affirming dismissal of inmate's petition; petitioner "fully served the custodial portion of the sentences he is attacking at the time he filed his habeas petition Therefore, the district court could not grant him any effective relief."

Summary of this case from Ayala v. Presiding Judge

affirming dismissal of inmate's petition; petitioner "fully served the custodial portion of the sentences he is attacking at the time he filed his habeas petition Therefore, the district court could not grant him any effective relief."

Summary of this case from Hill v. Ives
Case details for

Bonneau v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RYAN BONNEAU, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 4, 2013

Citations

503 F. App'x 544 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Yao v. Hussey

An inmate's release typically renders a habeas action - which seeks the termination of custody - moot. See,…

Odish v. Lynch

An inmate's release typically renders a habeas action - which seeks the termination of custody - moot. See,…