From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonilla v. Monrose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1995
221 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 13, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

To defeat the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, the plaintiffs should have offered a reasonable excuse for failing to timely serve their complaint and should have shown that they had a meritorious action by furnishing a sworn statement from a person having personal knowledge of the facts (see, Innerarity v County of Westchester, 144 A.D.2d 645). The plaintiffs failed to comply with either requirement. Balletta, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bonilla v. Monrose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1995
221 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Bonilla v. Monrose

Case Details

Full title:ISABELLA BONILLA et al., Appellants, v. RAMON MONROSE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 1015