From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods & Ace United States/Esis

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Nov 25, 2015
871 N.W.2d 761 (Minn. 2015)

Opinion

No. A15–0233.

11-25-2015

Maria BONILLA, Relator, v. DAKOTA PREMIUM FOODS and ACE USA/ESIS, Respondents, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Ingco International, Inc., Injured Workers Pharmacy, Novacare Rehabilitation, Summit Orthopedics, and West Side Community Health Services, Intervenors.

Vincent A. Petersen, Law Offices of Donald F. Noack, Mound, MN, for relator. Howard Y. Held, Lisa N. Truitt, Fitch, Johnson, Larson & Held, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.


Vincent A. Petersen, Law Offices of Donald F. Noack, Mound, MN, for relator.

Howard Y. Held, Lisa N. Truitt, Fitch, Johnson, Larson & Held, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on January 6, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/____________________

G. Barry Anderson

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods & Ace United States/Esis

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Nov 25, 2015
871 N.W.2d 761 (Minn. 2015)
Case details for

Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods & Ace United States/Esis

Case Details

Full title:Maria BONILLA, Relator, v. DAKOTA PREMIUM FOODS and ACE USA/ESIS…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Date published: Nov 25, 2015

Citations

871 N.W.2d 761 (Minn. 2015)