From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonifacio v. Great China Rest.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 15, 2022
22-CV-4646 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-4646 (VSB)

07-15-2022

PRISCILIANO CRISTOBAL BONIFACIO, Plaintiff, v. GREAT CHINA RESTAURANT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff filed this action on June 3, 2022, (Doc. 1), and filed affidavits of service on July 1 and July 5, 2022, (Docs. 5-6). The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's complaint was July 13, 2022. (See id.) To date, Defendants have not appeared or responded to the complaint. Plaintiff, however, has taken no action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, if Plaintiff intends to seek a default judgment, they are directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than July 22, 2022. If Plaintiff fails to do so or otherwise demonstrate that they intend to prosecute this litigation, I may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bonifacio v. Great China Rest.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 15, 2022
22-CV-4646 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Bonifacio v. Great China Rest.

Case Details

Full title:PRISCILIANO CRISTOBAL BONIFACIO, Plaintiff, v. GREAT CHINA RESTAURANT, et…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 15, 2022

Citations

22-CV-4646 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)