Opinion
No. 122646-7.
Decided June 27, 2003.
COA: 222602, 223998, Eaton CC: 96-000287-CZ.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2002 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the question whether plaintiffs are entitled to the benefit of the fraudulent concealment statute, MCL 600.5855, including whether plaintiffs properly preserved this issue for appellate review. In all other respects, the application for leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.