From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bond v. United States Attorney

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 12, 2008
293 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1320.

Submitted: August 28, 2008.

Decided: September 12, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-01188-WDQ).

William C. Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


William C. Bond appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his action seeking relief under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bond v. United States Attorney, No. 1:07-cv-01188-WDQ (D.Md. May 17 Nov. 20, 2007). Additionally, we deny all of Bond's pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Bond also appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration, motion to recuse, and motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Upon review of the record, we find the district court did not err in denying Bond's motions.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Bond v. United States Attorney

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 12, 2008
293 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Bond v. United States Attorney

Case Details

Full title:William C. BOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, District…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 12, 2008

Citations

293 F. App'x 222 (4th Cir. 2008)