From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bond v. Rhodes

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 8, 2006
2:05cv241, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2006)

Opinion

2:05cv241, Electronic Filing.

December 8, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on February 23, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on November 14, 2006, recommended that the Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Motion for Preliminary Injunction be denied. The parties were allowed ten days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on the Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail delivered to the State Correctional Institution at Greene, Waynesburg, Pennsylvania, where he is incarcerated, and on the Defendants. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2006,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Document No. 62) is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza, (Document No. 69) dated November 14, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Bond v. Rhodes

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 8, 2006
2:05cv241, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Bond v. Rhodes

Case Details

Full title:JESSE DERRICK BOND, Plaintiff, v. FNU RHODES, et al., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 8, 2006

Citations

2:05cv241, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2006)

Citing Cases

Airgood v. Twp. of Pine

Although the parties do not address it, the Court notes that an action for conversion against Defendant Pine…