From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bond v. PNC Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-318 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-318

12-01-2016

PAMELA BOND, Plaintiff v. PNC BANK and PAUL GRISSO, Defendants


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2016, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 12) of Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr., recommending that the court dismiss the complaint (Doc. 1) of pro se plaintiff Pamela Bond ("Bond") for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (see Doc. 12 at 2-12), wherein Judge Saporito observes that the court ordered Bond to show cause on or before June 28, 2016 why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, to wit: a failure of diversity jurisdiction and no apparent basis for federal question jurisdiction, (see Docs. 6, 10), and further upon consideration of Bond's late-filed objections (Doc. 14) to the report, and her request (Doc. 15) for additional time to file "a supporting brief for the case," neither of which acknowledge or answer the show cause directive issued by Judge Saporito, and, following a de novo review of the contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep't of Transp., 791 F. Supp. 2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999), the court finding Judge Saporito's analysis to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record before the court, and finding Bond's cursory objections to be without merit, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 12) of Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr., is ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 15) for extension of time is DENIED as moot.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Bond v. PNC Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-318 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Bond v. PNC Bank

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA BOND, Plaintiff v. PNC BANK and PAUL GRISSO, Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 1, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-318 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 2016)