From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonaparte v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 2001
289 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

89691

Decided and Entered: December 27, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Jerome Bonaparte, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. To the extent that the petition raises a substantial evidence issue, we find that the misbehavior report, together with the positive results of the urinalysis tests and the evidence adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence to support the charge of drug use (see, Matter of Melluzzo v. Selsky, 287 A.D.2d 850, 731 N.Y.S.2d 518). Likewise, we find that petitioner failed to demonstrate that the correction officer who performed the urinalysis tests did not adhere to the proper testing procedures (see, Matter of Morales v. Selsky, 281 A.D.2d 658, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 713; Matter of Giano v. Selsky, 273 A.D.2d 570, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 764). Finally, we find that the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to enable petitioner to prepare a defense (see,Matter of Ng v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 791).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Bonaparte v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 27, 2001
289 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Bonaparte v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEROME BONAPARTE, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

Scott v. Fischer

As for the witnesses that petitioner requested be called at the hearing, the record establishes that either…

Muniz v. Selsky

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized possession…