BONAPARTE v. BECK

Full title: GREGORY BONAPARTE, Plaintiff v. DEBBIE BECK, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 28, 2011

Case No. 3:07-cv-294-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07-cv-294-KRG-KAP.

March 28, 2011

MEMORANDUM ORDER

KIM GIBSON, District Judge

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on March 4, 2011, docket no. 87, recommending that summary judgment be granted to the remaining defendant, Debbie Beck.

The parties were notified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed timely objections that, to the extent they address the Report and Recommendation, assert that plaintiff can collaterally attack the disciplinary sanction in this civil complaint. docket no. 88. That is a meritless argument.

Upon de novo review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and the timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 28^th day of March, 2011, it is

ORDERED that summary judgment is granted to the remaining defendant Beck, and the complaint is dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.