From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bombin v. Sw. Airlines Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 16, 2022
CIVIL 5:20-cv-01883-JMG (E.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 5:20-cv-01883-JMG

12-16-2022

ADRIAN BOMBIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN M. GALLAGHER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Adrian Bombin and Samantha Rood's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 95), Defendant Southwest Airlines Co.'s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (ECF No. 100), any replies thereto, and for the reasons provided in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (ECF No. 95) is DENIED.

Defendant's Motion to Seal Document (ECF No. 99) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

Bombin v. Sw. Airlines Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 16, 2022
CIVIL 5:20-cv-01883-JMG (E.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Bombin v. Sw. Airlines Co.

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN BOMBIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 16, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 5:20-cv-01883-JMG (E.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 2022)