Bolton v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Layman v. State

    93 So. 66 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)   Cited 8 times

    The demurrers to count 1 were properly overruled. 87 So. 527; ante, p. 124, 90 So. 50. The court properly sustained demurrers to the defendant's pleas. Ante, p. 101, 90 So. 138; ante, p. 218, 90 So. 36.

  2. Wells v. State

    97 So. 681 (Ala. Crim. App. 1923)   Cited 26 times

    Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. The indictment is in the language of the statute, and is sufficient and not demurrable. Bolton v. State, 18 Ala. App. 124, 90 So. 50; 8 Mich. Ala. Dig. 628; 14 Mich. 163; Neely v. State, 18 Ala. App. 565, 93 So. 382. The act under which the indictment is found is constitutional. Brodgen v. State, 18 Ala. App. 56, 88 So. 366; Ricketts v. State, 18 Ala. App. 162, 90 So. 137; Bolton v. State, supra. If there is not sentence or judgment, there can be no appeal; and the appellate court, acquiring no jurisdiction, can only enter an order of dismissal.

  3. Newman v. State

    18 Ala. App. 430 (Ala. Crim. App. 1922)   Cited 3 times

    There is no merit in the various contentions made by the defendant. Ante, p. 101, 90 So. 138; Ante, p. 124, 90 So. 50; 17 Ala. App. 579, 88 So. 205; section 7140, Code 1907. BRICKEN, P.J.