From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolton v. Barber

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 4, 1974
205 S.E.2d 266 (Ga. 1974)

Summary

In Bolton v. Barber, 232 Ga. 70 (205 S.E.2d 266), this court held that the complaint was not subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim.

Summary of this case from Bolton v. Barber

Opinion

28735.

SUBMITTED MARCH 18, 1974.

DECIDED APRIL 4, 1974.

Specific performance. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Henley.

Gilbert, Wilkerson Hill, Fred A. Gilbert, for appellant.

Haas, Holland, Levison Gibert, Theodore G. Frankel, Richard L. Garrett, for appellee.


This is an interlocutory appeal authorized by the trial judge's certificate in which the appellant complains of a judgment denying the appellant's motion to dismiss the appellee's complaint for failure to state a claim.

It is obvious that the appellee's complaint stated a claim for relief pursuant to the Civil Practice Act, and it was not subject to dismissal. Appellant's enumerated errors and arguments here might be appropriate if the ruling below had been on a motion for summary judgment. However, that is not the situation, and the trial court's judgment overruling the appellant's motion was correct.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


SUBMITTED MARCH 18, 1974 — DECIDED APRIL 4, 1974.


Summaries of

Bolton v. Barber

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 4, 1974
205 S.E.2d 266 (Ga. 1974)

In Bolton v. Barber, 232 Ga. 70 (205 S.E.2d 266), this court held that the complaint was not subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim.

Summary of this case from Bolton v. Barber
Case details for

Bolton v. Barber

Case Details

Full title:BOLTON v. BARBER

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Apr 4, 1974

Citations

205 S.E.2d 266 (Ga. 1974)
205 S.E.2d 266

Citing Cases

Bolton v. Barber

1. In Bolton v. Barber, 232 Ga. 70 ( 205 S.E.2d 266), this court held that the complaint was not subject to…