From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolton v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0449 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0449 GEB KJM P.

September 5, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's August 29, 2007 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

Bolton v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0449 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Bolton v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN N. BOLTON, Petitioner, v. DARREL G. ADAMS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 5, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0449 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2007)