Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01293-MSK-KMT
08-24-2011
Magistrate Judge
FTR - Courtroom C-201
Deputy Clerk, Nick Richards
Fritz William Ganz
Robin Libow
Anthony Warnaars present with counsel
William David Byassee
Lara Sarah Nochomovitz
David R. Hammond
T.J. Carney
Kevin D. Allen
Natalie Elizabeth West
COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Court in Session: 9:07 a.m.
Court calls the case. Appearances of counsel.
Opening statements by the Court regarding District Judge Marcia S. Krieger's Practice
Standards located at www.cod.uscourts.gov.
The Court hears arguments on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited
Jurisdictional Discovery and for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant, Jeremy
Goldman's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 56, filed July 18, 2011].
It is ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Jurisdictional
Discovery and for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant,
Jeremy Goldman's Motion to Dismiss [56] is GRANTED. Any
discovery that directly addresses the allegations made in Mr.
Goldman's declaration [Doc. No. 52-1, filed July 8, 2011] are
allowed for jurisdictional discovery and will not count against normal
discovery limitations. Questions directed at Mr. Goldman's role, if
any, in the alleged conspiracy is merits discovery and will count
against discovery limitations.
Jurisdictional discovery regarding Mr. Goldman's declaration will be
submitted to the various parties on or before August 26, 2011.
Defendant's will respond on or before October 14, 2011. Plaintiff
will reply on or before November 4, 2011.
It is ORDERED: The deposition of Mr. Goldman as part of the jurisdictional
discovery process will be held via telephone or by video
conference. No counsel may appear in person at the deposition
without prior authorization from the court. Should Mr. Goldman's
attorney desire to appear in person with his client for the deposition,
however, any other counsel may also chose to appear in person.
In that event, the deposition will still proceed via telephone or video
conference for the benefit of counsel who wish to forego the
expense of travel to appear in person.
The Court hears discussion on e-discovery issues regarding the retrieval of personal
emails and the production of documents in native format. Electronic discovery will be
produced in native format whenever possible. If the discovery is not produced in native
format it will be because the native form of the document is not available.
[XX] Scheduling Order entered (as amended).
THE FOLLOWING WILL CONFIRM THE ACTIONS TAKEN AND DATES SET AT THE
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD THIS DATE.
DEADLINES:
Joinder of Parties/Amendment to Pleadings: October 10, 2011
Discovery Cut-off: February 20, 2012
Dispositive Motions Deadline: July 3, 2012
Each party group shall be limited to 6 expert witnesses.
Disclosure of Affirmative Experts: December 23, 2011
Disclosure of Rebuttal Experts: January 23, 2012
Written Discovery shall be served no later than 33 days prior to discovery cut-off.
Each party group as defined by the parties in Section 8(c) of the Proposed Scheduling
Order, shall be limited to 25 interrogatories, 25 requests for admission, and 25 requests
for documents.
Each party group shall be limited to the number and length of depositions prescribed in
the Scheduling Order.
NO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE is set at this time.
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE will be set by District Judge Marcia S. Krieger.
TRIAL:
Trial Preparation Conference and trial dates will be set by District Judge Marcia S.
Krieger.
Parties are directed to www.cod.uscourts.gov and shall fully comply with the procedures
of the judicial officer assigned to try this case on the merits.
Court in recess: 10:40 a.m.
Total In-Court Time: 01:33 Hearing concluded.
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at
(303) 825-6119.