From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bollman v. Superintendent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
May 23, 2016
CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-2 93 (N.D. Ind. May. 23, 2016)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-2 93

05-23-2016

ROBERT G. BOLLMAN, JR., Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Petition under 28 U.S.C. Paragraph 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert G. Bollman, Jr., on May 12, 2016. For the reasons set forth below, the petition (DE 1) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DISCUSSION

Robert G. Bollman, Jr., a pro se prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition attempting to have his parole revocation vacated. He argues that he was not given due process during the course of the hearing. However, before a petitioner can challenge a State proceeding, he must have previously presented his claims to the State courts. "This means that the petitioner must raise the issue at each and every level in the state court system, including levels at which review is discretionary rather than mandatory." Lewis v. Sternes, 390 F.3d 1019, 1025-1026 (7th Cir. 2004).

There are two possible methods for challenging a parole revocation in Indiana: by filing a post-conviction relief petition, Receveur v. Buss, 919 N.E.2d 1235 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), or by filing a state habeas corpus petition if the inmate is seeking immediate release. Lawson v. State, 845 N.E.2d 185, 186 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006). Furthermore, if a state habeas corpus petition is improperly filed, it will be converted to a post-conviction petition. Hardley v. State, 893 N.E.2d 740, 743 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) and Ward v. Ind. Parole Bd., 805 N.E.2d 893 (2004). Here, Bollman says that he has not presented either of his claims to any State court in any proceeding. Therefore he has not exhausted his State court remedies and this habeas corpus petition must be dismissed without prejudice. If, after he has ultimately presented his claims to the Indiana Supreme Court, he has not yet obtained relief, then he may return to this court and file a new habeas corpus petition.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, the petition (DE 1) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED: May 23, 2016

/s/ RUDY LOZANO, Judge

United State District Court


Summaries of

Bollman v. Superintendent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
May 23, 2016
CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-2 93 (N.D. Ind. May. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Bollman v. Superintendent

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT G. BOLLMAN, JR., Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: May 23, 2016

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-2 93 (N.D. Ind. May. 23, 2016)