From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boller and Boller

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 30, 1987
742 P.2d 1200 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

15-85-03554; CA A41768

Argued and submitted September 4, 1987.

Affirmed as modified September 30, 1987.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County, George J. Woodrich.

Russell D. Bevans, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Ann Aiken, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Thorp, Dennett, Purdy, Golden Jewett, P.C., Springfield.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed as modified. Costs to neither party.


The judgment is modified in one particular. The Bavarian china — an heirloom given to husband by his mother — referred to in paragraph 11(b)(1) in the "decree" was awarded to husband; however, the physical possession was given to wife "to maintain for the benefit of the minor children." In order to further the disentanglement of the parties, that provision is modified to provide that husband is awarded the china outright without any conditions or restrictions.

Affirmed as modified. Costs to neither party.


Summaries of

Boller and Boller

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 30, 1987
742 P.2d 1200 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Boller and Boller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of BOLLER, Respondent, and BOLLER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 30, 1987

Citations

742 P.2d 1200 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
742 P.2d 1200