From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boles v. Dansdill

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 21, 2009
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Jan. 21, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS.

January 21, 2009


ORDER


On December 11, 2008 the magistrate judge issued his recommendation (Doc 184) that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 157) be granted and that summary judgment be entered on the Second Amended Complaint in favor of defendants and against plaintiff with each party to pay their respective costs and fees. By Minute Order entered January 7, 2009 (Doc 188) I granted plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Stay Due to Interference with Litigation and granted the plaintiff up to and including February 20, 2009 to file his objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation. Plaintiff has failed to timely file objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation. Plaintiff is thus barred from de novo review. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 157) is GRANTED and summary judgment shall enter on the Second Amended Complaint in favor of defendants and against plaintiff with each party to bear their respective costs and fees.


Summaries of

Boles v. Dansdill

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 21, 2009
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Jan. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Boles v. Dansdill

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL M. BOLES, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD DANSDILL, LT. CHARLES PEOPLES, TOM…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 21, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Jan. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Boles v. Colo. Dep't of Corr.

(quotation omitted)); Boles v. Dansdill, No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS, 2009 WL 137171, at *7 (D. Colo. Jan.…