Boles v. Dansdill

Full title: RUSSELL M. BOLES, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD DANSDILL, LT. CHARLES PEOPLES, TOM…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 23, 2009

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Mar. 23, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01661-LTB-CBS.

March 23, 2009

ORDER

LEWIS BABCOCK, Chief District Judge

This case is before me on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 157) be granted and that summary judgment be entered on the Second Amended Complaint in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff with each party to pay their own costs and fees.

Plaintiff has now filed timely specific objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. I have therefore reviewed the thorough and comprehensive recommendation of the Magistrate Judge de novo in light of the objections to it and the file and record in this case. On de novo review I conclude that the recommendation is correct. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 157) is GRANTED and summary judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on the Second Amended Complaint with each party to bear their respective costs and fees.