Boldrini v. Wilson

Full title: ANTONELLO BOLDRINI, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN R. WILSON, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 26, 2012

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-11-1771 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-11-1771

12-26-2012

ANTONELLO BOLDRINI, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN R. WILSON, et al., Defendants.

A. Richard Caputo

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

(MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLEWITT)

ORDER

NOW, this 26th day of December, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Magistrate Judge Blewitt's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 46) is ADOPTED.

(A) Defendants Barrett, Bell, Doe, Johnson, Shaw, and Wilson's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Doc. 7) is GRANTED.
(B) Defendant Ponce's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc. 12) is GRANTED.
(C) Plaintiff Antonello Boldrini's constitutional claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.
(D) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state-law claims and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

(2) The Motion to Reinstate, Consolidate, and for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 32) is DENIED as moot. (3) The Motion to Strike Defendants' Response (Doc. 36) is DENIED as moot. (4) The Motion for a Second Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate, Consolidate, and for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 38) is DENIED as moot. (5) The Motion to Strike Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate, Consolidate, and for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 54) is DENIED as moot. (6) The Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 57) is DENIED as moot.

______________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge