From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boldon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 23, 1999
740 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-3341.

Opinion filed March 23, 1999.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus — Original Jurisdiction.

Noah Boldon, pro se, petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.


Noah Boldon petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court's failure to rule on his motion to withdraw his plea. However, it appears that the motion was made at a time when petitioner was represented by counsel in the trial court and therefore the trial judge was within his discretion to treat the motion as a nullity and disregard it. Smith v. State, 444 So.2d 542, 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Boldon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 23, 1999
740 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Boldon v. State

Case Details

Full title:NOAH BOLDON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 23, 1999

Citations

740 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Harris v. State

Because Harris was represented by counsel when he filed the pro se motion, the motion could properly be…