From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Jul 11, 2012
NO. 12-12-00200-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 12-12-00200-CV

07-11-2012

TERRY LYNN BOLDEN, APPELLANT v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE


APPEAL FROM THE 124TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS


MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant's docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., April 4, 2012. On June 5, 2012, this court requested that Appellant file a docketing statement immediately if he had not already done so.

Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in the June 5, 2012 notice, this court issued a second notice on June 18, 2012, advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement was filed or before June 28, 2012, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the court's request.

Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

JUDGMENT


NO. 12-12-00200-CV


TERRY LYNN BOLDEN, Appellant

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee


Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

of Gregg County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 2011-597-B)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.


Summaries of

Bolden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Jul 11, 2012
NO. 12-12-00200-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Bolden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:TERRY LYNN BOLDEN, APPELLANT v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Citations

NO. 12-12-00200-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2012)