From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolden v. Blocker

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 6, 2020
No. 20-6316 (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6316

10-06-2020

JASON BOLDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REX BLOCKER; ANNE ELIZABETH CUCCIO, Defendants - Appellees.

Jason Bolden, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (9:18-cv-03473-DCC) Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason Bolden, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jason Bolden appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to Appellees, and dismissing without prejudice Bolden's complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolden v. Blocker, No. 9:18-cv-03473-DCC (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bolden v. Blocker

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Oct 6, 2020
No. 20-6316 (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Bolden v. Blocker

Case Details

Full title:JASON BOLDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REX BLOCKER; ANNE ELIZABETH…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 6, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6316 (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)