From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bolden v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Feb 3, 2010
CAUSE NO. 3:09-CV-463 TLS (N.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2010)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:09-CV-463 TLS.

February 3, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


On February 2, 2010, Plaintiff, Arnold Bolden ("Bolden"), filed a motion to extend the time for filing his Opening Brief. However, Bolden's motion was unaccompanied by a form of order, pursuant to Local Rule 5.1. See N.D. L.R. 5.1(e) ("The filing of a motion or petition requiring the entry of a routine or uncontested order by the judge or the clerk shall be accompanied by a suitable form of order together with sufficient copies thereof for service upon all parties or their counsel.").

Because Bolden has failed to comply with the local rules, its motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. [Doc. No. 14]. Bolden may refile his motion along with the appropriate form of order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bolden v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
Feb 3, 2010
CAUSE NO. 3:09-CV-463 TLS (N.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Bolden v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ARNOLD BOLDEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:09-CV-463 TLS (N.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2010)