From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bokman v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 3, 1992
180 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 3, 1992.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff proffered a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving her notice of claim one day late, the delay was minimal, and there was no prejudice to the defendant. Consequently, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff the requested relief (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e; Matter of Cicio v. City of New York, 98 A.D.2d 38). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bokman v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 3, 1992
180 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Bokman v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:EDVARDA BOKMAN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)