From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bokin v. Scribner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 21, 2008
1:04-cv-06078 AWI DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2008)

Opinion

1:04-cv-06078 AWI DLB (PC).

October 21, 2008


ORDER GRANTING FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 38) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On May 2, 2008, defendants Winkler, Knowles, Reyes, and Sherman filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 23). Defendant Scribner filed a motion to join the motion to dismiss on May 20, 2008. (Doc. 25).

On October 14, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to respond to the Court's orders. (Doc. 38). As defendants' motion to dismiss is pending before the Court and plaintiff has not yet filed a response to the motion, the Court construes his request as a request to extend time to file his response.

The Court notes that plaintiff has already been granted three thirty day extensions of time to respond to the motion to dismiss. However, plaintiff has demonstrated good cause to grant a further extension of time, and accordingly, plaintiff's response is due no later than thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order.

The court cannot hold this case in abeyance indefinitely and therefore no further extensions of time to file a response to defendants' motions to dismiss shall be granted. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bokin v. Scribner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 21, 2008
1:04-cv-06078 AWI DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Bokin v. Scribner

Case Details

Full title:JACK ALEXANDER BOKIN, Plaintiff, v. A. SCRIBNER et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 21, 2008

Citations

1:04-cv-06078 AWI DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2008)