From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boily v. Walt Disney World Company

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 1, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-4967 (SDW-MCA) (D.N.J. May. 1, 2009)

Summary

concluding that advertisements by Disney in the forum state "alone are insufficient to establish general jurisdiction over Walt Disney World"

Summary of this case from Lewis v. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-4967 (SDW-MCA).

May 1, 2009


ORDER


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of United States Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo, dated April 1, 2009. The R R concerns Defendant Walt Disney World Company's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), as well as Plaintiffs' cross-motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11.

Oral argument on the pending motions was held on March 20, 2009. On that day, Judge Arleo issued a ruling on the record, accompanied by a written Order. Plaintiffs filed an informal motion for reconsideration on March 24, 2009. In a written Opinion and Order dated April 1, 2009, Judge Arleo considers the parties' arguments and recommends that Walt Disney World's motion to dismiss be denied, that its motion to transfer be granted, and that Plaintiffs' cross-motion for sanctions and informal motion for reconsideration be denied. No objection to the April 1st R R was filed.

The Court has reviewed the R R and the briefs and documents on file in this matter. Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown,

IT IS, on this 1st day of May, 2009,

ORDERED that the R R of Magistrate Judge Arleo dated April 1, 2009, is ADOPTED as the conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that defendant Walt Disney World's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that all motions for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 are DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that defendant Walt Disney World's motion to transfer this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Boily v. Walt Disney World Company

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
May 1, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-4967 (SDW-MCA) (D.N.J. May. 1, 2009)

concluding that advertisements by Disney in the forum state "alone are insufficient to establish general jurisdiction over Walt Disney World"

Summary of this case from Lewis v. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc.
Case details for

Boily v. Walt Disney World Company

Case Details

Full title:MARY M. BOILY, an individual; and VALMORE P. BOILY, her husband, per quod…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: May 1, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-4967 (SDW-MCA) (D.N.J. May. 1, 2009)

Citing Cases

Woodell v. Ethicon, Inc.

Therefore, "[t]ransfer is generally more in the interest of justice than dismissal." Boily v. Walt Disney…

Vuoncino v. Forterra, Inc.

"Transfer is generally more in the interest of justice than dismissal." Boily v. Walt Disney World Co., No.…