From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bohlen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
May 4, 1999
No. ED75085 (Mo. Ct. App. May. 4, 1999)

Opinion

No. ED75085.

Filed: May 4, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, HON. SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, Judge.

Elaine A. Pudlowski, 231 S. Bemiston, Suite 1111, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant. John Munson Morris III, Daniel W. Follett, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before: Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, J., and Mary Rhodes Russell, J.



ORDER


Antijuian Bohlen appeals the trial court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion for relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bohlen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
May 4, 1999
No. ED75085 (Mo. Ct. App. May. 4, 1999)
Case details for

Bohlen v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTIJUIAN BOHLEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: May 4, 1999

Citations

No. ED75085 (Mo. Ct. App. May. 4, 1999)