From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bohannon v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 5, 1993
262 Ga. 697 (Ga. 1993)

Opinion

S92G0910.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 5, 1993.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 203 Ga. App. 783.

Alden W. Snead, J. M. Raffauf, for appellant. David McDade, District Attorney, for appellee.


We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Bohannon v. State, 203 Ga. App. 783 ( 417 S.E.2d 679) (1992). The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed because the record shows that the trial court granted an out-of-time appeal and, consequently, this case is not subject to the rules governing extraordinary motions for new trial; that is, no application for appeal was required. We disagree with the Court of Appeals that by seeking (and obtaining) permission to file an out-of-time motion for new trial rather than an out-of-time appeal, Bohannon was necessarily pursuing an extraordinary motion for new trial. Likewise, we attach no significance to the fact that the trial court's permission was oral, not written, since that court in fact heard and denied the motion on its merits. Therefore, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a decision on the merits.

Judgment reversed and remanded. Clarke, C. J., Benham, Fletcher, Sears-Collins and Hunstein, JJ., concur.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 5, 1993.


Summaries of

Bohannon v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 5, 1993
262 Ga. 697 (Ga. 1993)
Case details for

Bohannon v. State

Case Details

Full title:BOHANNON v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 5, 1993

Citations

262 Ga. 697 (Ga. 1993)
425 S.E.2d 653

Citing Cases

Balkcom v. State

The fact that the notice of appeal filed on September 23, 1996, in this case designates both the judgment of…

Washington v. State

Where, however, a party obtains permission from the trial court to file an out-of-time motion for new trial…