From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boggs v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 4, 1977
341 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. AA-140.

February 4, 1977.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Volusia County; Warren H. Cobb, Judge.

Gosney, Haas, Cameron Parsons, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Honorable J.O. Eubank, of Smalbein, Eubank, Johnson, Rosier Bussey, Daytona Beach, for appellees.


A reading of the order granting a new trial from whence this appeal emanates reveals that one of the alternative bases recited by the trial court for granting a new trial was that the verdict was contrary to the evidence as it related to percentages of negligence. Appellant has made no attempt in her briefs to demonstrate that the court's said stated alternative ground was legally or factually erroneous. It is axiomatic that when an order of the trial court purports to be based upon several alternative grounds it will not be disturbed on appeal if one of the grounds is sufficient for the action taken even though another recited alternative ground is erroneous. Accordingly, the order here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C.J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Boggs v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 4, 1977
341 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Boggs v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. BOGGS, APPELLANT, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, ET AL.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 4, 1977

Citations

341 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)