Counsel's argument is not grounded in the FLSA's jurisprudence. Specifically, cases have found that the word "retail" affects the interpretation of entities that qualify as "service establishments." Bogash v. Baltimore Cigarette Service, 100 F.Supp. 250, 252 (D.C. Md. 1951) (stating, "[t]he word `retail' as used in the Act obviously is intended to modify the word `service' regardless of the use of the word `or' between them, — in other words, the provision is to be interpreted as though it read `retail selling or retail servicing establishment.'"). Accordingly, the Court finds that the Hornets must demonstrate a "retail" nature, whether it attempts to establish itself as a "retail" or "service" establishment.