From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boermeester (Matthew) v. Carry (Ainsley)

Supreme Court of California
May 2, 2023
No. S263180 (Cal. May. 2, 2023)

Opinion

S263180

05-02-2023

BOERMEESTER (MATTHEW) v. CARRY (AINSLEY)


B290675 Second Appellate District, Div. 8.

Order filed

The motion to strike filed by respondents Ainsley Carry and University of Southern California on April 13, 2021 is granted. We disregard those portions of the answering brief filed by appellant Matthew Boermeester on March 12, 2021, that cite or discuss evidence not contained within the administrative record. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(2)(C); Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge etc. Dist.(1979) 23 Cal.3d 180, 184, fn. 1; Taxpayers for Accountable School Bond Spending v. San Diego Unified School Dist. (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1013, 1066, fn. 35.)


Summaries of

Boermeester (Matthew) v. Carry (Ainsley)

Supreme Court of California
May 2, 2023
No. S263180 (Cal. May. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Boermeester (Matthew) v. Carry (Ainsley)

Case Details

Full title:BOERMEESTER (MATTHEW) v. CARRY (AINSLEY)

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 2, 2023

Citations

No. S263180 (Cal. May. 2, 2023)