From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boeje v. Anastasio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 2005
19 A.D.3d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-03462.

June 13, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated March 22, 2004, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Rodney S. Lapidus, P.C., Baldwin, N.Y., for appellants.

Milber, Makris, Plousadis Seiden, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Lorin A. Donnelly of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

In response to the defendant's establishment of her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact, inter alia, as to whether the defendant created the alleged icy condition on which the injured plaintiff fell ( see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Baillet v. Auerbach, 277 AD2d 335; Grizzaffi v. Paparodero Holding Corp., 261 AD2d 437, 438; Roca v. Gerardi, 243 AD2d 616, 617).


Summaries of

Boeje v. Anastasio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 2005
19 A.D.3d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Boeje v. Anastasio

Case Details

Full title:PETER BOEJE et al., Appellants, v. KATAYOUN ANASTASIO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 241

Citing Cases

Ricca v. Ahmad

The defendant Nasir Ahmad owned the store as a franchisee of the defendant 7-Eleven, Inc., and was…

Dylan v. CEJ Props., LLC

Here, in support of its motion, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter…