From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boehm v. Reider

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1925
98 N.J. Eq. 688 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued May term, 1925.

Decided October 19th, 1925.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, whose opinion is reported in 96 N.J. Eq. 167.

Messrs. Stamler, Stamler Koestler, for the appellant.

Mr. Abe J. David, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Boehm v. Reider

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1925
98 N.J. Eq. 688 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Boehm v. Reider

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. BOEHM, executor, c., appellant, v. MARY DOMAGAUER REIDER et…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 19, 1925

Citations

98 N.J. Eq. 688 (N.J. 1925)

Citing Cases

Weinberger v. Goldstein

All that the court is required to do, all that it should do, is to satisfy itself that the petitioners have a…

Reid v. McMichael Holdings, Inc.

The petitioner is not a party to this suit. But, see, Chancery Rule 13; Guest v. Hewitt, 27 N.J. Eq. 479;…