Opinion
BAP No. NM–13–046. Bankruptcy No. 12–13262. Adversary No. 12–01319.
2014-04-9
Boehm's appeal of the bankruptcy court's decision, which held that the Agreement remained in full force and effect, and thus both parties were entitled to specific performance of all their rights under the Agreement, is ultimately based on her disagreement with that court's factual findings. We cannot say that those findings, essentially that Boehm repudiated the Agreement and Pickel tendered a timely and adequate cure, are clearly erroneous. Therefore, the bankruptcy court's order is hereby AFFIRMED.