From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boehm v. Jack D. Pickel & Alameda Virgin Islands Co. (In re Pickel)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit.
Apr 9, 2014
512 B.R. 390 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

BAP No. NM–13–046. Bankruptcy No. 12–13262. Adversary No. 12–01319.

2014-04-9

In re Jack D. PICKEL, formerly doing business as Officer of Alameda Land Investment Corporation, doing business as Sole Member Alameda Virgin Islands Company, LLC, formerly doing business as Manager/Member of P.O.S.T. Land Ltd. Company, doing business as Officer of Club Comanche, Inc., doing business as J. Pickel & Company, Inc., Debtor. Mary Boehm, Plaintiff–Counter–Defendant–Appellant, v. Jack D. Pickel and Alameda Virgin Islands Company, LLC, Defendants–Counter–Claimants–Appellees.


Boehm's appeal of the bankruptcy court's decision, which held that the Agreement remained in full force and effect, and thus both parties were entitled to specific performance of all their rights under the Agreement, is ultimately based on her disagreement with that court's factual findings. We cannot say that those findings, essentially that Boehm repudiated the Agreement and Pickel tendered a timely and adequate cure, are clearly erroneous. Therefore, the bankruptcy court's order is hereby AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Boehm v. Jack D. Pickel & Alameda Virgin Islands Co. (In re Pickel)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit.
Apr 9, 2014
512 B.R. 390 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Boehm v. Jack D. Pickel & Alameda Virgin Islands Co. (In re Pickel)

Case Details

Full title:In re Jack D. PICKEL, formerly doing business as Officer of Alameda Land…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit.

Date published: Apr 9, 2014

Citations

512 B.R. 390 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2014)