From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bodine v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

United States District Court, D. Colorado
May 7, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00924-LTB (D. Colo. May. 7, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00924-LTB.

May 7, 2007


Order


Plaintiffs Janet Roebuck Bodine and Donald Bodine ("the Bodines") have filed a motion for a temporary restraining order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b) (Docket #4) against defendants Chase Home Finance, LLC ("Chase") and Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"). Fannie Mae has moved to strike the Bodines' motion (Docket #7). I adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law as stated at a Hearing on the Bodines' motion held in Court today.

It is so ordered that

1) The Bodines' motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED,

2) Fannie Mae's motion to strike is GRANTED; and

3) The Bodines' complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

DONE and ORDERED, at Denver, Colorado.


Summaries of

Bodine v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

United States District Court, D. Colorado
May 7, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00924-LTB (D. Colo. May. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Bodine v. Chase Home Finance, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JANET ROEBUCK BODINE, and DONALD BODINE, Plaintiffs, v. CHASE HOME…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: May 7, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00924-LTB (D. Colo. May. 7, 2007)