From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bodiford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 5, 1949
216 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. Crim. App. 1949)

Opinion

No. 24207.

January 5, 1949.

Record — Insufficient — Support Reversal.

Where the record contains no bills of exception, no exceptions to the court's charge, and no briefs are filed, and the evidence is sufficient to sustain conviction, the appellate court is not informed of any contention which would support a reversal.

Burglary. Appeal from District Court of Maverick County; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for two years.

Hon. Roger Thurmond, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

No attorney of record on appeal for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The appeal is from a conviction for burglary with a sentence of two years in the penitentiary.

The trial was to a jury and the evidence was sufficient to support their verdict. The record contains no bills of exception and no exceptions were taken to the court's charge. No brief was filed in the case and we are not informed of any contention made which would support a reversal.

Finding no error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Bodiford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 5, 1949
216 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. Crim. App. 1949)
Case details for

Bodiford v. State

Case Details

Full title:BERT BODIFORD v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 5, 1949

Citations

216 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. Crim. App. 1949)
216 S.W.2d 223