From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bodensteiner v. Vannais

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1990
167 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 16, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant's plea of guilty to assault in the third degree precludes him from litigating the issue of his liability at a subsequent civil trial, and the court properly granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability (see, Jordan v. Britton, 128 A.D.2d 315, 321-322).

The court did not abuse its discretion by deciding to prohibit evidence of the sexual conduct of either party. The decision whether to admit evidence that is logically relevant, but is so prejudicial that its probative value is outweighed, rests within the sound discretion of the court (see, People v. Davis, 43 N.Y.2d 17, 27, cert. denied 435 U.S. 998, rearg dismissed 61 N.Y.2d 670).


Summaries of

Bodensteiner v. Vannais

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1990
167 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Bodensteiner v. Vannais

Case Details

Full title:MARK P. BODENSTEINER, Respondent, v. DAVID VANNAIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 1017

Citing Cases

Tornatore v. Cohen

We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in precluding her from impeaching plaintiff with…

Ubiles v. Halliwell-Kemp

We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court abused its discretion in precluding her from impeaching…