From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boddy-Johnson v. Gilmore

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 17, 2024
Civil Action 18-198 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 18-198

06-17-2024

ZAHIR BODDY-JOHNSON Petitioner, v. ROBERT GILMORE, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI-GREENE, et al. Respondents.


ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

AND NOW, this 17th day of June 2024, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. No. 1], the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin [Doc. No. 13], Petitioner's Objections [Doc. No. 27], and all of the filings in this case, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's Objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED without a hearing;

4. A certificate of appealability will not issue as there is no basis for concluding that “reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further;” and

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Boddy-Johnson v. Gilmore

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 17, 2024
Civil Action 18-198 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Boddy-Johnson v. Gilmore

Case Details

Full title:ZAHIR BODDY-JOHNSON Petitioner, v. ROBERT GILMORE, SUPERINTENDENT…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 17, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 18-198 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2024)