From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bockhaus v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

March, 1915.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. (Ingraham, P.J., dissented on the ground that the application of the maxim res ipsa loquitur and the evidence of an uncommon jerk, which was the immediate cause of the accident, presented a question for the jury as to the negligence of the defendant.)


Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Bockhaus v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Bockhaus v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company

Case Details

Full title:George Bockhaus, Appellant, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1915

Citations

167 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Citing Cases

Sykes v. City of New York

In our opinion no actionable negligence on the part of the defendant was shown. ( Ayers v. Rochester Railway…