From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bochner v. Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-3416 LKK CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-3416 LKK CKD PS

07-24-2012

JOSEPH BOCHNER, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR MUNOZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has requested permission to utilize electronic filing. Plaintiff does not provide an e-mail address and has not set forth circumstances warranting an exception to the local rule which provides that persons appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing. See Local Rule 133(b)(2).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request (dkt. no. 9) is denied.

_________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bochner v. Munoz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-3416 LKK CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Bochner v. Munoz

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BOCHNER, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR MUNOZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-3416 LKK CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)