From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bobroff v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 1956
2 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

June 25, 1956

Present — Wenzel, Acting P.J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.


Action for the specific performance of contracts for the sale of real property and to recover damages for the breach of an alleged agreement by respondent, the vendee named in said contracts, to assign them to appellant. The appeal is from the order granting respondent's motion, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment in his favor. Order modified by adding the word "amended" before the word "complaint" in the second ordering paragraph. As so modified, order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent. This motion was made on the complaint, the amended complaint, and respondent's answer to the amended complaint, and therefore the order should have provided that the amended complaint be dismissed as to respondent.


Summaries of

Bobroff v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 1956
2 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Bobroff v. Herman

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD BOBROFF, Appellant, v. WILLIAM A. HERMAN, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1956

Citations

2 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)