From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bob v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1920
193 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

June, 1920.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. There is no reason why plaintiffs should not bring the action to trial on the merits, as suggested by the justice at Special Term. It could have been tried and decided at the June Special Term prior to the hearing and decision of this appeal, had the appellants so desired, and it may be tried during July, August or September in Special Term, Part II, under the assignment of terms made by this court for 1920, if the plaintiffs desire to try it. Jenks, P.J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bob v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1920
193 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Bob v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN D. BOB and LOUIS BASKIND, Copartners, Appellants, v. MAX GOLDSTEIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1920

Citations

193 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)