Opinion
No. CV 05-2217-PHX-JAT.
April 25, 2006
ORDER
On March 29, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Complaint in this case be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation (Defendant has not been served or appeared).
This Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is "clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) ( en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1126 (D.Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, `but not otherwise.'"). District courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (emphasis added); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made.").
Because no objections were filed,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8) is accepted and adopted, the Complaint is dismissed, without prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.