Boardman v. Hauck

Full title: JEFFERY A. BOARDMAN, Plaintiff, v. DYLAN HAUCK, and AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01934-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01934-DME-BNB

01-17-2012

JEFFERY A. BOARDMAN, Plaintiff, v. DYLAN HAUCK, and AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendants.

Boyd N. Boland

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

ORDER

This matter arises on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to File Rebuttal Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures to Defendant's Rebuttal Disclosures [Doc. # 26, filed 1/13/2012] (the "Motion"). The plaintiff claims the need to rebut the defendants' neuroradiologist and physical medicine experts because they "have challenged the diagnosis by Plaintiff's treating physicians." Motion [Doc. # 26] at ¶¶3, 5. The defendants do not oppose the Motion.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion [Doc. # 26] is GRANTED; and

(2) The plaintiff shall designate experts in rebuttal to the opinions of defendants' neuroradiologist and physical medicine experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before January 30, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge