From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boardman v. Hauck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01934-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01934-DME-BNB

08-09-2012

JEFFREY A. BOARDMAN, Plaintiff, v. DYLAN HAUCK, an individual, and AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendants.

James Fosnaught Sander Karp (No appearance) Heather Salg


JUDGE DAVID M. EBEL

Courtroom Deputy: Emily Seamon

Court Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt

Counsel:

James Fosnaught

Sander Karp

(No appearance)

Heather Salg

COURTROOM MINUTES

HEARING: TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

1:14 p.m. Court in session.

Also seated at Plaintiff's table: paralegal Ginny Lemon.

Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding having a jury of eight, the jury selection process, the trial schedule, time for opening and closing statements, trial time, issues regarding jury instructions, objections during video depositions, accommodating the needs of Plaintiff's counsel and the Plaintiff, and the Court reading the parties' joint stipulation of fact to the jury. The Court ruled on several written and oral motions. The Court's rulings are without prejudice to the parties' ability to renew these motions or objections.

ORDER: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Allow Trial Testimony by Telephone [Doc. No. 57, Filed August 7, 2012] is GRANTED. Officer Martin Donohue may appear by video conference on Wednesday, August 15, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. at the federal courthouse in Grand Junction, Courtroom 323.

ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Regarding Defendant's Assertion of the Seat Belt Defense Pursuant to C.R.S. § 42-4-237(7) [Doc. No. 58, Filed August 8, 2012] is DENIED.

ORDER: The jury will not be permitted to hear evidence of the uninsured motorist insurance policy limits.

ORDER: Parties and witnesses may use a laser pointer as necessary to facilitate testimony.

ORDER: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Submit Second Amended Exhibit List [Doc. No. 55, Filed August 7, 2012] is GRANTED.

ORDER: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Submit Amended Witness List [Doc. No. 56, Filed August 7, 2012] is GRANTED.

ORDER: The Court sustains Defendant's objection to Plaintiff's reader wearing a doctor's coat while reading the deposition testimony of Dr. Lorah.

ORDER: Plaintiff's witness Dr. Krauth may step out of the witness box and come to counsel table to operate the laptop to show an MRI.

ORDER: Plaintiff's objection to the untimely disclosure of Defendant's demonstrative exhibit is sustained.

ORDER: Witnesses will be sequestered.

2:21 p.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded.

Total in-court time: 1:07


Summaries of

Boardman v. Hauck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01934-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Boardman v. Hauck

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY A. BOARDMAN, Plaintiff, v. DYLAN HAUCK, an individual, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01934-DME-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 9, 2012)